Hellige, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hellige, Inc. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 16, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1871

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 21, 1966

DocketC.D. 2714

StatusPublished

This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 16 (Hellige, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hellige, Inc. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 16, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1871 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Nichols, Judge:

When the suit listed above was called, there was no appearance by plaintiff either in person or by attorney. A motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was made on behalf of the defendant.

An examination of the official papers indicates that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly, motion made on behalf of the defendant is denied and protest is dismissed as being untimely.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, Judge:

When the suit listed above was called, there was no appearance by plaintiff either in person or by attorney. A motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was made on behalf of the defendant.

An examination of the official papers indicates that the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly, motion made on behalf of the defendant is denied and protest is dismissed as being untimely.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Cust. Ct. 16, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hellige-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1966.