Hellerman v. Weinbrot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hellerman v. Weinbrot

277 A.D.2d 785

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 785 (Hellerman v. Weinbrot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hellerman v. Weinbrot, 277 A.D.2d 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion by the appellant to dismiss the amended complaint upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appellant’s time within which to answer the amended complaint is extended for ten days after entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and Mac-Crate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion by the appellant to dismiss the amended complaint upon the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appellant’s time within which to answer the amended complaint is extended for ten days after entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and Mac-Crate, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hellerman-v-weinbrot-nyappdiv-1950.