Heller v. Yaeger

261 A.D. 807, 24 N.Y.S.2d 587

This text of 261 A.D. 807 (Heller v. Yaeger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heller v. Yaeger, 261 A.D. 807, 24 N.Y.S.2d 587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The absence of denials of the allegations of the complaint was called to the attention of this court and of the Court of Appeals upon the prior appeal. Nevertheless, the Court of Appeals directed that a new trial be had. (283 N. Y. 19.)

The order appealed from, therefore, should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with leave to the defendant, if he be so advised, to apply for permission to amend his answer.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to the defendant, if he be so advised, to apply for permission to amend his answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heller v. Yaeger
27 N.E.2d 219 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 807, 24 N.Y.S.2d 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heller-v-yaeger-nyappdiv-1941.