Heller v. Sipkin-Gorschen & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heller v. Sipkin-Gorschen & Co.

233 A.D. 819

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 819 (Heller v. Sipkin-Gorschen & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heller v. Sipkin-Gorschen & Co., 233 A.D. 819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, because of error in the court’s charge in reference to the testimony of the expert called by defendant. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes for affirmance on the ground that the error complained of is not so prejudicial as to require a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, because of error in the court’s charge in reference to the testimony of the expert called by defendant. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes for affirmance on the ground that the error complained of is not so prejudicial as to require a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heller-v-sipkin-gorschen-co-nyappdiv-1931.