Heller v. National Waistband Co.

168 F. 1020, 93 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4534
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 8, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We see no reason to order a rehearing, nor to certify the-question to the Supreme Court. The decisions in Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 334, 24 Sup. Ct. 665, 48 L. Ed. 997, and Matter of Christensen Eng. Co., 194 U. S. 458, 24 Sup. Ct. 729, 48 L. Ed. 1072, cover the case now presented. The decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals in the First Circuit (Wilson v. Calculagraph Co., 153 Fed. 961, 83 C. C. A. 77) indicates that this order at the heel of the final decree might be reviewed by appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heller v. National Waistband Co., 168 F. 1020, 93 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4534 (2d Cir. 1909).

168 F. 1020 (Heller v. National Waistband Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cutting v. Van Fleet
252 F. 100 (Ninth Circuit, 1918)