Heller v. E. D. Sassoon Banking Co.
284 A.D. 869, 134 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3850
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed and motion granted to vacate the warrant of attachment and the service of the summons by publication, with $10 costs. The complaint and the submitted affidavits clearly show that plaintiff has failed to establish a cause of action against this defendant. Where it is shown that the plaintiff must ultimately fail, the warrant should be vacated (Wulfsohn v. Russian Republic, 234 N. Y. 372, 377). Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ. [See post, p. 948.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heller v. E. D. Sassoon Banking Co., 284 A.D. 869, 134 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).
284 A.D. 869 (Heller v. E. D. Sassoon Banking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wulfsohn v. Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic
138 N.E. 24 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)