Heller v. District of Columbia

814 F.3d 480, 421 U.S. App. D.C. 212, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3428, 2016 WL 760940
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 2016
Docket14-7071
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 814 F.3d 480 (Heller v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heller v. District of Columbia, 814 F.3d 480, 421 U.S. App. D.C. 212, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3428, 2016 WL 760940 (D.C. Cir. 2016).

Opinions

ORDER

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc

PER CURIAM.

Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto were circulated to the full court, and a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges eligible to participate did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wrenn v. District of Columbia
167 F. Supp. 3d 86 (District of Columbia, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
814 F.3d 480, 421 U.S. App. D.C. 212, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3428, 2016 WL 760940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heller-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-2016.