Heller v. Brown

31 A. 168, 57 N.J.L. 634, 28 Vroom 634, 1895 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 109
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 15, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 31 A. 168 (Heller v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heller v. Brown, 31 A. 168, 57 N.J.L. 634, 28 Vroom 634, 1895 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 109 (N.J. 1895).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

The complaint of the overseer failed to set forth that, by reason of the alleged desertion, the family of the defendant might become. chargeable to the township. Such an allegation is essential to the jurisdiction of the justice. Gedney v. Dey, 15 Vroom 576.

[635]*635Objection to jurisdiction upon this ground was made at the opening of the trial below, and, before going into the merits; it is, therefore, up now as a reason for setting aside the justice’s order.

The proceedings are reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A. 168, 57 N.J.L. 634, 28 Vroom 634, 1895 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heller-v-brown-nj-1895.