Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Faulkner, Sheehan & Wunsch, Duke, Gerstel, Shearer & Bregante v. United States
This text of 36 F.3d 1109 (Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Faulkner, Sheehan & Wunsch, Duke, Gerstel, Shearer & Bregante v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
36 F.3d 1109
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
HELLER, EHRMAN, WHITE & MCAULIFFE, Faulkner, Sheehan &
Wunsch, Duke, Gerstel, Shearer & Bregante,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
The UNITED STATES and Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the
Interior, Defendants-Appellants,
and
Jesse Short, Susan M. Masten and Valerie Reed, Defendants.
No. 94-1293.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
July 11, 1994.
[Appeal After Remand from 992 F.2d 360].
DISMISSED.
ORDER
The parties having so agreed, it is
ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F.3d 1109, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18269, 1994 WL 467225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heller-ehrman-white-mcauliffe-faulkner-sheehan-wunsch-duke-cafc-1994.