Hellems v. Public Service Commission

West Virginia Court of Claims

Hellems v. Public Service Commission

21 Ct. Cl. 67

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 26, 1996

DocketCC-95-342

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ct. Cl. 67 (Hellems v. Public Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hellems v. Public Service Commission, 21 Ct. Cl. 67 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Amended Answer.

The claimant seeks payment of $1,442.37 for travel expenses while an employee of the respondent. In support of its claim, the claimant submitted travel expense account forms (WVTMP 5.0) with his Notice of Claim. The travel forms were not processed for payment in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In its Amended Answer, the respondent admits the validity of the claim in the amount of $1,442.37, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which the travel expenses could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $1,442,37.

[68]*68Award of $1,442.37.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for a decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Amended Answer.

The claimant seeks payment of $1,442.37 for travel expenses while an employee of the respondent. In support of its claim, the claimant submitted travel expense account forms (WVTMP 5.0) with his Notice of Claim. The travel forms were not processed for payment in the proper fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In its Amended Answer, the respondent admits the validity of the claim in the amount of $1,442.37, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year with which the travel expenses could have been paid.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $1,442,37.

[68]*68Award of $1,442.37.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ct. Cl. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hellems-v-public-service-commission-wvctcl-1996.