Helinski v. Helinski
245 So. 3d 722
CourtFlorida Third District Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 30, 2017
DocketCASE NO.: 3D17–2001
StatusPublished
This text of 245 So. 3d 722 (Helinski v. Helinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Florida Third District Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Helinski v. Helinski, 245 So. 3d 722 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari, and the response and reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.
Upon consideration of petitioner's motion for appellate attorney's fees, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied.
Petitioner's motion to expedite is hereby denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
245 So. 3d 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helinski-v-helinski-fladistctapp3-2017.