Home/Florida Third District Court of Appeal/Helinski v. Helinski

Helinski v. Helinski

245 So. 3d 722
Florida Third District Court of Appeal·Decided October 30, 2017·No. CASE NO.: 3D17–2001·Published

Opinion

Following review of the petition for writ of certiorari, and the response and reply thereto, it is ordered that said petition is hereby denied.

Upon consideration of petitioner's motion for appellate attorney's fees, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied.

Petitioner's motion to expedite is hereby denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Helinski v. Helinski, 245 So. 3d 722 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

245 So. 3d 722 (Helinski v. Helinski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.