Helgerson v. Alley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Helgerson v. Alley

235 N.W. 366, 58 S.D. 437, 1931 S.D. LEXIS 95

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedMay 11, 1931

DocketFile No. 7183

StatusPublished

This text of 235 N.W. 366 (Helgerson v. Alley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Helgerson v. Alley, 235 N.W. 366, 58 S.D. 437, 1931 S.D. LEXIS 95 (S.D. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ingle demurred to the amended complaint of the plaintiff, and from an order overruling his demurrer he has appealed. The complaint is far from a model pleading, but we are not convinced, that the learned trial judge erred in holding the same good as against demurrer. We think no useful purpose would be served by setting out the complaint or discussing the matter at further length.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ingle demurred to the amended complaint of the plaintiff, and from an order overruling his demurrer he has appealed. The complaint is far from a model pleading, but we are not convinced, that the learned trial judge erred in holding the same good as against demurrer. We think no useful purpose would be served by setting out the complaint or discussing the matter at further length.

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 N.W. 366, 58 S.D. 437, 1931 S.D. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helgerson-v-alley-sd-1931.