Helgans v. Plurad

New York Court of Appeals

Helgans v. Plurad

711 N.E.2d 639, 93 N.Y.2d 882, 689 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 695

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 1999·Published

Opinion

Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that portion of Supreme Court’s order denying appellants’ motion to amend the complaint, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portion of the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Consti *883 tution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that portion of Supreme Court’s order denying appellants’ motion to amend the complaint, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portion of the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Consti *883 tution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Helgans v. Plurad, 711 N.E.2d 639, 93 N.Y.2d 882, 689 N.Y.S.2d 425, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 695 (N.Y. 1999).

Pincite

711 N.E.2d 639 (Helgans v. Plurad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.