Helfrich v. Marshall
This text of Helfrich v. Marshall (Helfrich v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
PETER JASON HELFRICH, No. 69472 Appellant, vs. RICK MARSHALL; ELIZABETH NEIGHBORS; LAKES CROSSING FILED CENTER; NYE COUNTY UNDERSHERIFF; AND THE STATE OF JAN 13 2016 NEVADA, TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondents. SY DEPUTY CLERK 0
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order resolving a motion to quash service of process. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge. Our review of the docketing statement and the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, an order resolving a motion to quash service of process is not appealable. Jarstad u. Nat'l Farmers Union Prop. & Gas. Co., 92 Nev. 380, 552 P.2d 49 (1976). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947T et. Ic,- 0 I 1 0 cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Peter Jason Helfrich Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk
(0) 1947A e 2 legiarn at_
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Helfrich v. Marshall, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helfrich-v-marshall-nev-2016.