Helfrich v. Marshall
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
PETER JASON HELFRICH, No. 69472 Appellant,
vs.
RICK MARSHALL; ELIZABETH NEIGHBORS; LAKES CROSSING FILED CENTER; NYE COUNTY UNDERSHERIFF; AND THE STATE OF JAN 13 2016 NEVADA, TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
Respondents. SY DEPUTY CLERK 0
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from an order resolving a motion to quash service of process. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge.
Our review of the docketing statement and the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, an order resolving a motion to quash service of process is not appealable. Jarstad u. Nat'l Farmers Union Prop. & Gas. Co., 92 Nev. 380, 552 P.2d 49 (1976). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947T et.
Ic,- 0 I 1 0
cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Peter Jason Helfrich Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A e 2 legiarn
at_
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Helfrich v. Marshall (Helfrich v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.