Home/Second Circuit/Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.

Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.

254 F.2d 470
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 19, 1958·No. Nos. 24524-24527·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HINCKS and LUMBARD, Circuit Judges.

The motion to recall the mandate and clarify the opinion and judgment is denied, the moving party to pay the costs of printing the plaintiffs’ brief. There is no merit whatsoever to the contention of the defendant Sales Affiliates, Inc. Judge Kaufman, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 582, has correctly interpreted our opinion and it needs no clarification. This is the second such motion to delay the proceedings. It is desirable that the District Court proceed forthwith in accordance with our opinion, 247 F.2d 940, filed on September 5, 1957.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc., 254 F.2d 470 (2d Cir. 1958).

254 F.2d 470 (Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Helene Curtis Industries, Inc., and Helene Curtis Sales, Inc., C. v. Layden, Doing Business as South-Western Beauty Products Company, Plaintiff-Intervener v. Sales Affiliates, Inc., the Gillette Company, Skillern & Sons, Inc., and Walgreen Drug Company of Texas, Plaintiffs-Interveners v. Sales Affiliates, Inc., Sales Affiliates, Inc., the Procter & Gamble Company, Involuntary v. C. v. Layden, Doing Business as South-Western Beauty Products Company, Sales Affiliates, Inc., the Procter & Gamble Company, Involuntary v. Skillern & Sons, Inc., and Walgreen Drug Company of Texas, and the Gillette Company
254 F.2d 470 (Second Circuit, 1958)