Helen Vanloon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marshall Vanloon, Mark Vanloon, and Marsha Venza v. Sergio Tavares, M.D. and Herbert Edward Madalin, M.D.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 21, 2001
Docket13-00-00777-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Helen Vanloon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marshall Vanloon, Mark Vanloon, and Marsha Venza v. Sergio Tavares, M.D. and Herbert Edward Madalin, M.D. (Helen Vanloon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marshall Vanloon, Mark Vanloon, and Marsha Venza v. Sergio Tavares, M.D. and Herbert Edward Madalin, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Helen Vanloon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marshall Vanloon, Mark Vanloon, and Marsha Venza v. Sergio Tavares, M.D. and Herbert Edward Madalin, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-00-777-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

HELEN VAN LOON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF

MARSHALL VAN LOON, DECEASED, MARK VAN LOON AND MARSHA VENZA , Appellants,

v.

SERGIO TAVARES, M.D. , Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 94th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez

Opinion Per Curiam


Appellants, HELEN VAN LOON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARSHALL VAN LOON, DECEASED, MARK VAN LOON AND MARSHA VENZA , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 99-00059-C . After the record and appellants' brief were filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellants state that this case has been resolved and appellants no longer wish to prosecute this appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 21st day of June, 2001 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Helen Vanloon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marshall Vanloon, Mark Vanloon, and Marsha Venza v. Sergio Tavares, M.D. and Herbert Edward Madalin, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helen-vanloon-individually-and-as-representative-of-the-estate-of-marshall-texapp-2001.