Helen Vanloon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marshall Vanloon, Mark Vanloon, and Marsha Venza v. Sergio Tavares, M.D. and Herbert Edward Madalin, M.D.
This text of Helen Vanloon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marshall Vanloon, Mark Vanloon, and Marsha Venza v. Sergio Tavares, M.D. and Herbert Edward Madalin, M.D. (Helen Vanloon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marshall Vanloon, Mark Vanloon, and Marsha Venza v. Sergio Tavares, M.D. and Herbert Edward Madalin, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-00-777-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
____________________________________________________________________
HELEN VAN LOON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF
MARSHALL VAN LOON, DECEASED, MARK VAN LOON AND MARSHA VENZA , Appellants,
v.
SERGIO TAVARES, M.D. , Appellee.
____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 94th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
O P I N I O N
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellants, HELEN VAN LOON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARSHALL VAN LOON, DECEASED, MARK VAN LOON AND MARSHA VENZA , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 99-00059-C . After the record and appellants' brief were filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellants state that this case has been resolved and appellants no longer wish to prosecute this appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 21st day of June, 2001 .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Helen Vanloon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marshall Vanloon, Mark Vanloon, and Marsha Venza v. Sergio Tavares, M.D. and Herbert Edward Madalin, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helen-vanloon-individually-and-as-representative-of-the-estate-of-marshall-texapp-2001.