Helen Fong, Also Known as Helen Poy, Also Known as Fong Hong May v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Helen Fong, Also Known as Helen Poy, Also Known as Fong Hong May v. United States

368 F.2d 325, 18 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5933, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4645

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 21, 1966·No. 20619·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The taxpayer appeals from a judgment of the District Court denying her recovery of interest which she had paid upon interest accrued prior to a jeopardy assessment under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, from the date of notice .and demand following the jeopardy assessment until the date of notice and demand following final decision of the Tax Court upon appellant’s petition for redetermination of the tax.

The case at bar is substantially identical to Ginsburg v. United States, 1 Cir., 278 F.2d 470, rehearing denied, 278 F.2d 473 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 878, 81 S.Ct. 166, 5 L.Ed.2d 101 (1960), which held adversely to the taxpayer’s contentions here. Appellant urges us to reject the rationale of Ginsburg but, all circumstances considered, we find no compelling reason for doing so.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The taxpayer appeals from a judgment of the District Court denying her recovery of interest which she had paid upon interest accrued prior to a jeopardy assessment under the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, from the date of notice .and demand following the jeopardy assessment until the date of notice and demand following final decision of the Tax Court upon appellant’s petition for redetermination of the tax.

The case at bar is substantially identical to Ginsburg v. United States, 1 Cir., 278 F.2d 470, rehearing denied, 278 F.2d 473 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 878, 81 S.Ct. 166, 5 L.Ed.2d 101 (1960), which held adversely to the taxpayer’s contentions here. Appellant urges us to reject the rationale of Ginsburg but, all circumstances considered, we find no compelling reason for doing so.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Helen Fong, Also Known as Helen Poy, Also Known as Fong Hong May v. United States, 368 F.2d 325, 18 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5933, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4645 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

368 F.2d 325 (Helen Fong, Also Known as Helen Poy, Also Known as Fong Hong May v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related