Helen E. Puryear v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of 57 F.3d 1070 (Helen E. Puryear v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
57 F.3d 1070
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Helen E. PURYEAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-5861.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 13, 1995.
Before MARTIN and SILER, Circuit Judges; JOINER, District Judge.*
ORDER
On appeal from a judgment of the district court affirming the decision of the Secretary,
This cause came on to be heard on the record compiled before the Secretary, the record of district court proceedings and briefs and oral argument of the parties. Upon due consideration thereof the court concludes that the findings and decision of the Secretary are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.
It is therefore ORDERED that the judgment of the district court in this case be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Honorable Charles W. Joiner, Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F.3d 1070, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20914, 1995 WL 355681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helen-e-puryear-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ca6-1995.