Helderle v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Helderle v. State

528 S.W.3d 485

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 26, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104311

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 528 S.W.3d 485 (Helderle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Helderle v. State, 528 S.W.3d 485 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

James M. Helderle (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was found guilty, after a jury trial, of first-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.160 (RSMo. 2000); forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060; felonious restraint, in violation of Section 565.120; and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. Movant was sentenced to consecutive terms of eight years’ imprisonment for burglary, 20 years’ imprisonment for forcible sodomy, seven years’ imprisonment for felonious restraint, and 40 years’ imprisonment for armed criminal action, for a total sentence of 75 years.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

James M. Helderle (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment, after an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was found guilty, after a jury trial, of first-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.160 (RSMo. 2000); forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060; felonious restraint, in violation of Section 565.120; and armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015. Movant was sentenced to consecutive terms of eight years’ imprisonment for burglary, 20 years’ imprisonment for forcible sodomy, seven years’ imprisonment for felonious restraint, and 40 years’ imprisonment for armed criminal action, for a total sentence of 75 years.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 S.W.3d 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helderle-v-state-moctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack