Helder v. Wiesel

251 A.D. 747, 296 N.Y.S. 65, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7355

This text of 251 A.D. 747 (Helder v. Wiesel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Helder v. Wiesel, 251 A.D. 747, 296 N.Y.S. 65, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

In an action to recover for injuries to person and property arising out of a collision between two automobiles, judgment in favor of plaintiffs reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. In view of the conflicting claims as to how the collision occurred, it was error to exclude testimony, offered by defendants, as to the nature and extent of the damage to plaintiff Harry Helder’s automobile. Davis, Adel and Close, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Johnston, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 747, 296 N.Y.S. 65, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helder-v-wiesel-nyappdiv-1937.