Held v. Held

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Held v. Held

201 A.D.2d 301, 608 N.Y.S.2d 835

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 301 (Held v. Held) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Held v. Held, 201 A.D.2d 301, 608 N.Y.S.2d 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered March 10, 1992, which, inter alia, restored temporary maintenance of $500 a week in favor of plaintiff, sua sponte, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in the reinstatement of [302]*302the temporary maintenance award, and reiterate that "the proper remedy of a party who thinks that temporary support payments ordered are excessive * * * is to press for an early trial” (Dreyfus v Dreyfus, 72 AD2d 522). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered March 10, 1992, which, inter alia, restored temporary maintenance of $500 a week in favor of plaintiff, sua sponte, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in the reinstatement of [302]*302the temporary maintenance award, and reiterate that "the proper remedy of a party who thinks that temporary support payments ordered are excessive * * * is to press for an early trial” (Dreyfus v Dreyfus, 72 AD2d 522). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 301, 608 N.Y.S.2d 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/held-v-held-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack