Held v. Held

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Held v. Held

201 A.D.2d 301, 608 N.Y.S.2d 835

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 8, 1994·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered March 10, 1992, which, inter alia, restored temporary maintenance of $500 a week in favor of plaintiff, sua sponte, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in the reinstatement of [302]*302the temporary maintenance award, and reiterate that "the proper remedy of a party who thinks that temporary support payments ordered are excessive * * * is to press for an early trial” (Dreyfus v Dreyfus, 72 AD2d 522). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered March 10, 1992, which, inter alia, restored temporary maintenance of $500 a week in favor of plaintiff, sua sponte, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in the reinstatement of [302]*302the temporary maintenance award, and reiterate that "the proper remedy of a party who thinks that temporary support payments ordered are excessive * * * is to press for an early trial” (Dreyfus v Dreyfus, 72 AD2d 522). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Held v. Held, 201 A.D.2d 301, 608 N.Y.S.2d 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

201 A.D.2d 301 (Held v. Held) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related