Helber v. Schantz

67 N.W. 913, 109 Mich. 669, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 920
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 30, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 67 N.W. 913 (Helber v. Schantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Helber v. Schantz, 67 N.W. 913, 109 Mich. 669, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 920 (Mich. 1896).

Opinion

Moore, J.

Plaintiff furnished five dollars to defendant with which to make a bet upon the result of an election. The bet was made, and Schantz won the money. He paid plaintiff five dollars, and declined to pay over the balance. Plaintiff sued him in justice’s court, and recovered a judgment. The case was appealed to the circuit court. The trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant upon the ground that what occurred between the parties was a gaming transaction, and that the courts will not inter[670]*670fere in behalf of a party to such a transaction. The case is brought here by writ of error.

The trial judge made a proper disposition of the case. The judgment is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC
Michigan Supreme Court, 2025
National Recovery System v. Kasle
662 F. Supp. 139 (E.D. Michigan, 1987)
Kuhl v. M. Gally Universal Press Co.
123 Ala. 452 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 N.W. 913, 109 Mich. 669, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helber-v-schantz-mich-1896.