Helber v. Schantz

67 N.W. 913, 109 Mich. 669, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 920
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 30, 1896·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Moore, J.

Plaintiff furnished five dollars to defendant with which to make a bet upon the result of an election. The bet was made, and Schantz won the money. He paid plaintiff five dollars, and declined to pay over the balance. Plaintiff sued him in justice’s court, and recovered a judgment. The case was appealed to the circuit court. The trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant upon the ground that what occurred between the parties was a gaming transaction, and that the courts will not inter[670]*670fere in behalf of a party to such a transaction. The case is brought here by writ of error.

The trial judge made a proper disposition of the case. The judgment is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Helber v. Schantz, 67 N.W. 913, 109 Mich. 669, 1896 Mich. LEXIS 920 (Mich. 1896).

67 N.W. 913 (Helber v. Schantz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacqueline Davis v. Betmgm LLC
Michigan Supreme Court, 2025
National Recovery System v. Kasle
662 F. Supp. 139 (E.D. Michigan, 1987)
Kuhl v. M. Gally Universal Press Co.
123 Ala. 452 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)