Hektograph Co. v. Fourl

11 F. 844, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2607
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedAugust 9, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 11 F. 844 (Hektograph Co. v. Fourl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hektograph Co. v. Fourl, 11 F. 844, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2607 (S.D.N.Y. 1881).

Opinion

Blatchford, C. J.

In this and the nine other cases I think the new attorneys must be substituted, without prejudice, of course, to any existing lien of the former attorneys on papers, but without the imposition or creation of any lien on any future recoveries in favor of the former attorneys in respect to their first services. Whatever might be done in a case where the client, without any reason but his wish, desired to displace his attorneys, I think that as, in this ease, the attorneys withdrew of their own motion, and no special reasons are shown for impressing a lien in their favor on any ultimate recoveries, no such lien should be created as a condition of the substitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F. 844, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hektograph-co-v-fourl-nysd-1881.