Hejazi v. Saydack Law LLC

495 P.3d 751, 314 Or. App. 614

Opinion

Submitted August 6, affirmed September 15, 2021

HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAYDACK LAW LLC and Jessica Saydack, Defendants. Lane County Circuit Court 20AD0013; A175301 495 P3d 751

Amit K. Kapoor, Judge. Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as 314 Or App 614 (2021) 615

PER CURIAM As allowed under ORS 19.205(2), and explained in Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or App 58, 60, 898 P2d 196 (1995), plaintiff appeals an order denying his request for a waiver or deferral of filing fees and sheriff’s service fees. Plaintiff’s opening brief, however, contains no argu- ment, and we affirm for that reason. See Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818), 314 Or App 1, 496 P3d 1073 (2021) (affirming denial of fee waiver where the appellant’s brief contained no pertinent argument). Affirmed.