Hejazi v. Eugene Municipal Court
This text of 495 P.3d 753 (Hejazi v. Eugene Municipal Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Submitted August 6, affirmed September 15, 2021
HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EUGENE MUNICIPAL COURT and City of Eugene, Defendants. Lane County Circuit Court 21AD0013; A175373 495 P3d 753
R. Curtis Conover, Judge. Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as 314 Or App 622 (2021) 623
PER CURIAM As allowed under ORS 19.205(2), and explained in Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or App 58, 60, 898 P2d 196 (1995), plaintiff appeals an order denying his request for a waiver or deferral of filing fees and sheriff’s service fees. Plaintiff’s opening brief, however, contains no argu- ment, and we affirm for that reason. See Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818), 314 Or App 1, 496 P3d 1073 (2021) (affirming denial of fee waiver where the appellant’s brief contained no pertinent argument). Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
495 P.3d 753, 314 Or. App. 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hejazi-v-eugene-municipal-court-orctapp-2021.