Heizman, S. v. CCP Phila. County
This text of Heizman, S. v. CCP Phila. County (Heizman, S. v. CCP Phila. County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
SHANE HEIZMAN, : No. 1 EM 2018 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COMMON PLEAS COURT OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED. To the extent the Petition for Mandamus and Extraordinary Relief
seeks extraordinary relief, it is DENIED.
To the extent the Petition for Mandamus and Extraordinary Relief asks that
adjudication of the pending PCRA petition be compelled, it is GRANTED. The Court of
Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to adjudicate the PCRA petition
within 60 days and to promptly notify this Court of its adjudication.
Jurisdiction is RETAINED.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the
Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County and the Commonwealth.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Heizman, S. v. CCP Phila. County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heizman-s-v-ccp-phila-county-pa-2018.