Heitler v. United States
260 U.S. 703, 67 L. Ed. 472, 43 S. Ct. 163, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2410
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Heitler v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 U.S. 438 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 27, 1922·No. No. 185; No. 186; No. 187; No. 188; No. 189·Published
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; (2) Jeffrey Mfg. Co. v. Blagg, 235 U. S. 571, 576; Blair v. United States, 250 U. S. 273, 279; Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant, 257 U. S. 282, 289; (3) National Prohibition Cases, 253 U. S. 350.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heitler v. United States, 260 U.S. 703, 67 L. Ed. 472, 43 S. Ct. 163, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2410 (1922).
260 U.S. 703 (Heitler v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. Blagg
235 U.S. 571 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Sugarman v. United States
249 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Blair v. United States
250 U.S. 273 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham
253 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1920)
National Prohibition Cases
253 U.S. 350 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. Bondurant
257 U.S. 282 (Supreme Court, 1921)