Heitler v. United States

Seventh Circuit

Heitler v. United States

289 F. 1021, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2093

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedMay 2, 1923

DocketNos. 3266-3270

StatusPublished

This text of 289 F. 1021 (Heitler v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heitler v. United States, 289 F. 1021, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2093 (7th Cir. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record discloses a contrariety of evidence as to the guilt of the defendants who were on trial, a number of whom the jury acquitted. Concededly there was evidence which, if believed by the jury, would support its verdict of conviction of plaintiffs in error. Error is assigned and urged mainly on the rejection of evidence, remarks in closing argument to the jury of the district attorney, and the rulings thereon of the trial judge, the court’s charge to the jury, and the failure to prove certain ones of the alleged criminal objects of the conspiracy charged. In our judgment it ■will serve no useful purpose to present here discussion of these or the other alleged errors. Suffice it to say, we find none of them sustained. No reversible error appearing, each of the judgments herein is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The record discloses a contrariety of evidence as to the guilt of the defendants who were on trial, a number of whom the jury acquitted. Concededly there was evidence which, if believed by the jury, would support its verdict of conviction of plaintiffs in error. Error is assigned and urged mainly on the rejection of evidence, remarks in closing argument to the jury of the district attorney, and the rulings thereon of the trial judge, the court’s charge to the jury, and the failure to prove certain ones of the alleged criminal objects of the conspiracy charged. In our judgment it ■will serve no useful purpose to present here discussion of these or the other alleged errors. Suffice it to say, we find none of them sustained. No reversible error appearing, each of the judgments herein is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 F. 1021, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 2093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heitler-v-united-states-ca7-1923.