Heisten v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.
This text of 249 A.D. 603 (Heisten v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously modified by eliminating the provision for examination through Bartlett Arkell, and by striking from the last paragraph of the order the words “ with leave to plaintiff to inspect and make copies or photostats thereof,” and by providing that there may be a limited inspection and use of papers and documents under the rule laid down in Zeltner v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (220 App. Div. 21), and as so modified affirmed, without costs. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Dore, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 603, 291 N.Y.S. 781, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heisten-v-beech-nut-packing-co-nyappdiv-1936.