Home/Superior Court of Pennsylvania/Heist v. Montayne

Heist v. Montayne

53 Pa. Super. 617, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 228
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Heist v. Montayne. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 Pa. Super. 611 →
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 16, 1913·No. No. 2·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

This case involves only the same question which has been considered in the case between the same parties in which an opinion has this day been filed at No. 5, October Term, 1912, ante, p. 611, although the claim in the present case was filed against a different building. The specifications of error are overruled, for the reasons stated in the opinion to which we refer.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heist v. Montayne, 53 Pa. Super. 617, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 228 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).

53 Pa. Super. 617 (Heist v. Montayne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.