Heisley v. Paymaster Checkwriter Co.
140 S.E.2d 290, 111 Ga. App. 11, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 861
This text of 140 S.E.2d 290 (Heisley v. Paymaster Checkwriter Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heisley v. Paymaster Checkwriter Co., 140 S.E.2d 290, 111 Ga. App. 11, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 861 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965).
Opinion
There being no certification by the trial judge that the bill of exceptions is true, this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the exceptions. Pierce v. Haygood, 213 Ga. 459 (99 SE2d 906); Echols v. State, 103 Ga. App. 537 (120 SE2d 350).
Upon motion the writ of error is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pierce v. Haygood
99 S.E.2d 906 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Echols v. State
120 S.E.2d 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
140 S.E.2d 290, 111 Ga. App. 11, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heisley-v-paymaster-checkwriter-co-gactapp-1965.