Heisley v. Paymaster Checkwriter Co.
140 S.E.2d 290, 111 Ga. App. 11, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 861
Opinion
There being no certification by the trial judge that the bill of exceptions is true, this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the exceptions. Pierce v. Haygood, 213 Ga. 459 (99 SE2d 906); Echols v. State, 103 Ga. App. 537 (120 SE2d 350).
Upon motion the writ of error is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heisley v. Paymaster Checkwriter Co., 140 S.E.2d 290, 111 Ga. App. 11, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 861 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965).
140 S.E.2d 290 (Heisley v. Paymaster Checkwriter Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pierce v. Haygood
99 S.E.2d 906 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Echols v. State
120 S.E.2d 350 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)