Home/Supreme Court/Heisler v. Board of Review

Heisler v. Board of Review

343 U.S. 939, 72 S. Ct. 1036, 96 L. Ed. 1346, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2127
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 5, 1952
DocketNo. 684
StatusPublished

This text of 343 U.S. 939 (Heisler v. Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heisler v. Board of Review, 343 U.S. 939, 72 S. Ct. 1036, 96 L. Ed. 1346, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2127 (1952).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dis[940]*940miss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.

Leo Pfeffer for appellant. C. William O’Neill, Attorney General of Ohio, Joseph S. Gill, First Assistant Attorney General, John W. Hardwick, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert E. Leach, Chief Counsel, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 U.S. 939, 72 S. Ct. 1036, 96 L. Ed. 1346, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 2127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heisler-v-board-of-review-scotus-1952.