Heiser v. Van Dyke, Martin & Co.
This text of 27 Iowa 359 (Heiser v. Van Dyke, Martin & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In overruling this motion the court below did not err. The Code of 1851 (§§ 1780-1786) is not unlike the provisions of Revision, sections 3062-3076.
The case of Cook & Owsley v. Walters (4 Iowa, 72) was decided in 1856, under the Code of 1851, and clearly sustains this ruling. There the jury separated without the leave of the court or the consent of the parties. It was held that the separation did not necessarily make the verdict void, nor so taint it as to prevent its reception. Not being otherwise attacked (and the same is true in this case) it was held good, and see the many cases there cited, also Miller v. Mabon, 6 Iowa, 456; Morrison v. Overton, 20 id. 465; Hamilton v. Barton, id. 505.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Iowa 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heiser-v-van-dyke-martin-co-iowa-1869.