Heird v. State
This text of 734 So. 2d 1059 (Heird v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wavell HEIRD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Fred Parker Bingham II, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). As in Locke, we certify the following question to be one of great public importance:
DOES THE FAILURE OF THE TRIAL COURT TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE EACH STATUTORILY AUTHORIZED COST INDIVIDUALLY AT THE TIME OF SENTENCING CONSTITUTE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR?
BARFIELD, C.J., JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
734 So. 2d 1059, 1998 WL 821844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heird-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.