Heir Bros. v. United States
This text of 17 Cust. Ct. 464 (Heir Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined [465]*465in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Ac.t of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.
A written stipulation of fact, upon which the cases have been submitted, establishes that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)) is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutoiy values for the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made on entry by the importers because of advances in similar cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Cust. Ct. 464, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heir-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1946.