Heinzen v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heinzen v. Bell

243 A.D. 826

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 826 (Heinzen v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heinzen v. Bell, 243 A.D. 826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff was struck by an automobile; he suffered injury to his hip and to his elbow. The extent of these injuries was in sharp conflict between the doctors. The doctor who examined him immediately after the accident and the following day found mere abrasions and superficial injuries. There was a question of fact for the jury as to the extent of these injuries. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff was struck by an automobile; he suffered injury to his hip and to his elbow. The extent of these injuries was in sharp conflict between the doctors. The doctor who examined him immediately after the accident and the following day found mere abrasions and superficial injuries. There was a question of fact for the jury as to the extent of these injuries. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinzen-v-bell-nyappdiv-1935.