Heinz v. State of New York
This text of 220 A.D.2d 387 (Heinz v. State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Blinder, J.), entered April 19, 1994.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Judge Blinder at the Court of Claims in his memorandum decisions dated September 11, 1990, and March 25, 1994. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 A.D.2d 387, 632 N.Y.S.2d 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinz-v-state-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1995.