Heinz v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Heinz v. State

544 S.W.3d 314

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 3, 2018·No. No. ED 105457·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*315John Paul Heinz appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*315John Paul Heinz appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Heinz v. State, 544 S.W.3d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

544 S.W.3d 314 (Heinz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.