Heintz v. Suburban Journals of Greater St. Louis

829 S.W.2d 677, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 924, 1992 WL 114338
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 2, 1992·No. No. 60760·Published

Opinion

[678]*678ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing Counts I and II of his two count second amended petition in a civil case with prejudice. An extended opinion would not have precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heintz v. Suburban Journals of Greater St. Louis, 829 S.W.2d 677, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 924, 1992 WL 114338 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

829 S.W.2d 677 (Heintz v. Suburban Journals of Greater St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.