Heinsheimer Bros. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Heinsheimer Bros. v. United States

37 Cust. Ct. 355

United States Customs Court·Decided September 5, 1956·No. No. 60220; protest 208488-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise on the invoice covered by entry No. 800825 do not simulate any natural flower in their physical characteristics and appearances and that said items have been produced by subjecting fibers of ramie to various processing steps, which result in a completed article of commerce in chief value of ramie, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the merchandise covered by said entry No. 800825.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise on the invoice covered by entry No. 800825 do not simulate any natural flower in their physical characteristics and appearances and that said items have been produced by subjecting fibers of ramie to various processing steps, which result in a completed article of commerce in chief value of ramie, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the merchandise covered by said entry No. 800825.

Heinsheimer Bros. v. United States, 37 Cust. Ct. 355 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

37 Cust. Ct. 355 (Heinsheimer Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.