Heins v. Manhattan Railway Co.

Superior Court of New York

Heins v. Manhattan Railway Co.

28 N.Y.S. 780

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedMay 7, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 28 N.Y.S. 780 (Heins v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heins v. Manhattan Railway Co., 28 N.Y.S. 780 (superctny 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

FREEDMAN, J.

It was the duty oí the appellants to procure the order for the filing of the case after its settlement, on 1893, and to attend to the filing. No sufficient reason has been given why the appellants neglected their duty in this respect. The case having been declared abandoned by an order duly made, entered, and served, and the appellants having taken no steps to be relieved from this order, nor any step to bring the appeal before the general term upon the judgment roll alone, the respondent’s motion should be granted, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FREEDMAN, J.

It was the duty oí the appellants to procure the order for the filing of the case after its settlement, on 1893, and to attend to the filing. No sufficient reason has been given why the appellants neglected their duty in this respect. The case having been declared abandoned by an order duly made, entered, and served, and the appellants having taken no steps to be relieved from this order, nor any step to bring the appeal before the general term upon the judgment roll alone, the respondent’s motion should be granted, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 N.Y.S. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heins-v-manhattan-railway-co-superctny-1894.