Heinrichsdorf v. Keppler Bros.

Hamilton Circuit Court

Heinrichsdorf v. Keppler Bros.

34 Ohio C.C. Dec. 83

DecidedDecember 9, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ohio C.C. Dec. 83 (Heinrichsdorf v. Keppler Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heinrichsdorf v. Keppler Bros., 34 Ohio C.C. Dec. 83 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under Snbd. 3, Sec. 5058 R. S., the plaintiff may unite several causes of action upon contracts in the same petition, but under R. S. 5059, they must affect all the parties to the action.

A cause of action upon a bond given in an injunction suit and a cause of action upon an appeal bond given in the same case with different sureties in each, do not affect all the parties to the action, and hence are improperly joined.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Under Snbd. 3, Sec. 5058 R. S., the plaintiff may unite several causes of action upon contracts in the same petition, but under R. S. 5059, they must affect all the parties to the action.

A cause of action upon a bond given in an injunction suit and a cause of action upon an appeal bond given in the same case with different sureties in each, do not affect all the parties to the action, and hence are improperly joined.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Ohio C.C. Dec. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinrichsdorf-v-keppler-bros-ohcircthamilton-1905.