Heinrich v. Spence
This text of 297 P. 1118 (Heinrich v. Spence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Irene Heinrich, nine years of age, was struck and severely injured by an automobile owned and operated by defendant. The record discloses a case of flagrant negligence on the part of the driver whose car skidded about sixty feet on dry concrete. pavement before it hit the little girl. She was crossing the pavement during the noon hour to go to school. Apparently no attention was. paid to school caution signs. The verdict of the jury in favor of plaintiff, for $2,113.50 was, indeed, very reasonable. Defendant had a fair trial and should have been satisfied.
Finding no errors which would warrant a reversal, it -follows that the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 P. 1118, 136 Or. 705, 1931 Ore. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinrich-v-spence-or-1931.