Heinrich v. Madden
This text of 496 So. 2d 995 (Heinrich v. Madden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Sheriff of Hillsborough County, Walter Heinrich, appeals from an order denying the forfeiture of a 1968 Cessna 310 aircraft.
The Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act defines contraband to include “any ... vehicle of any kind ... which has been or is actually employed as an instrumentality in the commission of, or in aiding or abetting in the commission of, any felony.” § 932.-701(2)(e), Fla.Stat. (1985). Here, the appel-lee’s airplane was an element of the felony offense of reckless operation of an aircraft and not an instrumentality used in the commission of, or in aiding or abetting in the commission of a felony in violation of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. Thus, the trial court correctly dismissed the sheriffs petition.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
496 So. 2d 995, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2339, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinrich-v-madden-fladistctapp-1986.