Heinrich Roedel v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Heinrich Roedel v. United States

184 F.2d 520

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 15, 1950

Docket12507

StatusPublished

This text of 184 F.2d 520 (Heinrich Roedel v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heinrich Roedel v. United States, 184 F.2d 520 (9th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

184 F.2d 520

Heinrich ROEDEL, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12507.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1950.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1950.

John S. Howell, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Frank J. Hennessy, U.S. Atty., Joseph Karesh, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

184 F.2d 520

Heinrich ROEDEL, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12507.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1950.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1950.

John S. Howell, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Frank J. Hennessy, U.S. Atty., Joseph Karesh, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The order of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 F.2d 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinrich-roedel-v-united-states-ca9-1950.