Heinlen v. Southern Pacific Railroad
This text of 4 P. 15 (Heinlen v. Southern Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The notice of appeal was given September 9, 1882. On the 1st of April, 1884, the plaintiff (respondent) moved that the appeal be dismissed, on the ground that no transcript had been filed in this court. Time was given to appellant to file affidavits showing why the transcript had not been filed. The time given having expired, and no affidavits having been filed, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed. A transcript was filed after the motion was made, but no reason appears why it was not filed before. Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 P. 15, 65 Cal. 304, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinlen-v-southern-pacific-railroad-cal-1884.