Heinlen v. Centerville & Kingsbury Irrigation Ditch Co.
4 P. 417, 2 Cal. Unrep. 347
This text of 4 P. 417 (Heinlen v. Centerville & Kingsbury Irrigation Ditch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heinlen v. Centerville & Kingsbury Irrigation Ditch Co., 4 P. 417, 2 Cal. Unrep. 347 (Cal. 1884).
Opinion
There was no abuse of discretion on the part of the court below in granting defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment and award the defendant a trial.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 P. 417, 2 Cal. Unrep. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinlen-v-centerville-kingsbury-irrigation-ditch-co-cal-1884.