Heinlein v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Heinlein v. State

243 So. 2d 178

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 1971·No. No. 71-50·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, pursuant to Rule 6.15(d) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., seeks review of an order of the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County, Florida, denying bail pending his appeal from judgments of conviction for possession of heroin.

Upon consideration of the record and argument of counsel, we have concluded that the order under review is not in compliance with Rule 6.15(b) and (c), supra. Therefore, it is reversed with directions to the trial court to hold a hearing on the appellant’s application for bond and if bond is denied the reasons therefor be set forth in the court’s order.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, pursuant to Rule 6.15(d) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., seeks review of an order of the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County, Florida, denying bail pending his appeal from judgments of conviction for possession of heroin.

Upon consideration of the record and argument of counsel, we have concluded that the order under review is not in compliance with Rule 6.15(b) and (c), supra. Therefore, it is reversed with directions to the trial court to hold a hearing on the appellant’s application for bond and if bond is denied the reasons therefor be set forth in the court’s order.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Heinlein v. State, 243 So. 2d 178 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

243 So. 2d 178 (Heinlein v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.