Heinle v. Heinle

502 P.2d 986, 88 Nev. 588, 1972 Nev. LEXIS 536

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In the circumstances disclosed by the record, we believe the trial court erred neither in its disposition of the parties’ community property, NRS 125.150(1), nor in ordering appellant to pay respondent $75 per month for the support of the parties’ minor daughter, NRS 125.140(2). Recounting those circumstances, which in combination are unique, would create no useful precedent.

Affirmed.