Heinitz v. Shushansky
199 A.D. 936
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1921·Published
Opinion
Judgment of the County Court of Bungs county reversed, and the usual judgment of foreclosure and sale, with costs to plaintiff, rendered here upon the findings contained in the decision, upon authority of Hothorn v. Louis (52 App. Div. 218, 224; affd., without opinion, 170 N. Y. 576); Pizer v. Herzig (120 App. Div. 102) and Cole v. Hinck (Id. 355). Blackmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heinitz v. Shushansky, 199 A.D. 936 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).
199 A.D. 936 (Heinitz v. Shushansky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hothorn v. . Louis
62 N.E. 1096 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Hothorn v. Louis
52 A.D. 218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Pizer v. Herzig
120 A.D. 102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)