Heinitz v. Shushansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heinitz v. Shushansky

199 A.D. 936

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D. 936 (Heinitz v. Shushansky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heinitz v. Shushansky, 199 A.D. 936 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the County Court of Bungs county reversed, and the usual judgment of foreclosure and sale, with costs to plaintiff, rendered here upon the findings contained in the decision, upon authority of Hothorn v. Louis (52 App. Div. 218, 224; affd., without opinion, 170 N. Y. 576); Pizer v. Herzig (120 App. Div. 102) and Cole v. Hinck (Id. 355). Blackmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the County Court of Bungs county reversed, and the usual judgment of foreclosure and sale, with costs to plaintiff, rendered here upon the findings contained in the decision, upon authority of Hothorn v. Louis (52 App. Div. 218, 224; affd., without opinion, 170 N. Y. 576); Pizer v. Herzig (120 App. Div. 102) and Cole v. Hinck (Id. 355). Blackmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D. 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinitz-v-shushansky-nyappdiv-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack